Dear All
We are using a simulation of A9 core based on Cadence Palladium, its identical to working with an actual A9 core except for speed.
When connecting using 642d, the connection fails. See attached image for details.
However
When connecting using 500i, connection is successful . See attached image.
Can you think of a reason for the different behavior between the version.
Thanks
Hila, Nuvoton
We are using a simulation of A9 core based on Cadence Palladium, its identical to working with an actual A9 core except for speed.
When connecting using 642d, the connection fails. See attached image for details.
However
When connecting using 500i, connection is successful . See attached image.
Can you think of a reason for the different behavior between the version.
Thanks
Hila, Nuvoton