Dear all,
there was another thread about 10 months ago that was mentioning that the 'size' element of a memory segment is not working. For this there is a workaround mentioned.
I found that : address_symbol:A symbolic name for the end address of the memory segment
is also not working. There is also the possibility to work with the name of the segment as __<name>_segment_end__ . However, it would be nice to set a more independent variable name (that I use in my C-Program).
Additionally I like to know if there is a way to set other symbolic names than the one at the beginning/end of a segment or section. In GNU linker scripts you can set any symbolic name to any value. This is sometimes helpful in my applications.
Best Regards
Markus
there was another thread about 10 months ago that was mentioning that the 'size' element of a memory segment is not working. For this there is a workaround mentioned.
I found that : address_symbol:A symbolic name for the end address of the memory segment
is also not working. There is also the possibility to work with the name of the segment as __<name>_segment_end__ . However, it would be nice to set a more independent variable name (that I use in my C-Program).
Additionally I like to know if there is a way to set other symbolic names than the one at the beginning/end of a segment or section. In GNU linker scripts you can set any symbolic name to any value. This is sometimes helpful in my applications.
Best Regards
Markus