Search Results

Hi, EmbOS version 4.32 has been released, but I don't see any modifications about the limitation of 50 tasks in embOSView and SystemView. It seems the limitation is always present in this version. Could tell me if it is planned to suppress this limitation in a future version of embOS ? Regards,

Hi, Thanks for your prompt answer. Do you have any idea about the date of the future embOS 4.32 version ? Is there an easy workaround with some tweak of embOS which let me bypass this limitation before the embOS 4.32 version ? Regards Vincent

Is it possible to modify embOS (macro definition...) to allow embOS return the information for more than 50 tasks ? Or is this limitation also dependent of embOSView ? It could be great for us to customize the tasks limitations in order we can debug all our tasks. Regards, Vincent

Hi, It seems that SystemView limits the number of task that can be display at 50 tasks. This is the same limitations than for EmbOSView. But I don't understand because in all the documentation of embOS, Segger claims that the number of tasks is unlimited but has no tools to monitor all these tasks ! Is there a way to see all the tasks of the system, monitor their activity and know the total number of task of the system ?

Hi, I want to log information in the Terminal View of SystemView. I use the "SEGGER_SYSVIEW_Print()" function and I'm able to see my data in the terminal view. I also want to have the context column filled with the information of the current task. Is there a way to do that, without having the OS Profile activated ? Because with OS Profile activated I've a lot of data about the OS and Task activité and I'm quickly blocked with the 1 000 000 events limitation with stop my trace.

Hi, Thanks for your answer. Could you give me more details about the version of SystemView which has no limitation on events number ? Best regards, Vincent

Hi, I'm using SystemView to log information from my application in the Terminal view. It seems that SystemView is limited to 1 000 000 events, which means for my application a runtime of several seconds. It is possible to configure SystemView UI to be able to suppress this limitation of events and get the application running all the time (for example with a circular buffer which lets us the possibility to get only the 1 000 000 last events). Without this possibility, SystemView can not be used b…

Hello Jordi, Could you tell me if the usage of the Nestable interrupt solve your problem of characters loss ?

I'm always experiencing issue using interrupt. I'm on EmbOS, version 3.08 for M32C. I assume this a old version of EmbOS, but I can't do the update to the last version for the moment because I have to evaluate the impact and no time for that. In my application, I have 6 Rs232 and 1 CAN bus, each have an interrupt handler. I have a loss of data on Rs232, and I suspect the fact that interrupt are not nestable. The character lost are on Rs232 with the highest IT priority. When I have a look on func…

Sorry for the post of source code. I'll wait for your email to help me solve my problem. But from my point of view it sounds like a critical problem as my application is completely frozen on the infinite loop I mentionned.

Hi, I have two configuration for my IAR project. One is Debug configuration where the output to EmbOSView is activated on OS_UART=1 and one is a Release configuration where the EMbOSView is deactivated OS_UART=-1. When I have a look on rtosinit.c, I have the following code: #else /* No communication routines */ void OS_COM_Init(void) {} void OS_COM_Send1(OS_U8 c) { OS_COM_ClearTxActive(); /* let OS know that transmitter is not busy */ } void OS_Sendstring(void) { } #endif /* (OS_UART==0) (OS_UAR…

Ok, the I flag is right so it seems to work. I experience some freeze of my software. It seems to be due to OS which is locked in "OS_Send1" function because OS_TxActive variable is never equal to zero. What is strange is that I'm not using the feedback for EmbOSView. Are you aware of a bug in v3.08 for the the function OS_Send1 in relation with OS_TxActive ? Do you a way of resolution of this issue? Regards. Vincent

Hi, I'm aware of the fact that Interrupt can only be nested by interrupt of higher priority. But, what are the prerequisite to the use of Nestable Interrupt, could you provided me sample of code? Is it correctly implemented in version 3.08 ?

Hi, I work on EmbOS for M32C, version 3.08, IAR Compiler V3.30. I'm using four UARTs on my application to communicate with others firmware. The communication on one UART is full duplex, the firmware can send spontaneous message to my application. I'm experiencing some overrun of data on that UART. It's seems to be due to the fact that my application is sending data while the firmware is also sending data. I think that the reason of the loss of data in reception could be due to the fact that the …