Search Results
Search results 1-20 of 437.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
Hello, We have applied to some major changes to the templates resulting in a massive performance boost. The now called SEGGER's high performance flash loaders (templates) are part of the J-Link Development Support Kit (DSK): wiki.segger.com/J-Link_Device_Support_Kit#DSK_availability Best regards Erik
-
Hi all, We are not aware of such an issue in recent versions. I just gave it a quick try here using two different evaluation boards but I cannot reproduce any problems. Test setup: - NUCLEO-L432KC / NUCLEO-F411RE - J-Link software V7.22 - arm-none-eabi-gdb (8.0.50.20171128) - J-Link GDB Server CL started via command line (included in the test suite linked below) - Embedded Studio project (included in the test suite linked below) The test suite is available for download here: download.segger.com/…
-
Please excuse the delay in response. It's been some quite busy days... It's not forgotten and we plan to have a look at this later this week or next week at the latest. I will keep you posted. Best regards Erik
-
Hello, I just noticed that we received the same request via our ticket system. Sorry for the delay in response, your inquiry got overlooked somehow. This should of course not happen. As you are within valid support period, we will get back to you regarding this their ASAP. Sorry for any inconveniences may caused. Best regards Erik
-
A clean VM would be appreciated as this could speed things up and allows us to check if the our fix works in your environment as well. Investigation is scheduled for later this / next week.
-
Hello, Just to make sure that we got you right, in your case, our software passes NumBytes == 0 to SEGGER_OPEN_Read()? If yes, could you please upload the flashloader project + used JLinkDevices.xml file + step-by-step instructions which can be used to reproduce this behavior here? Thanks, Erik
-
Hello, For RA6M4, the J-Link software has to use a very device specific method due to the security extensions. Right now, this method is supported via J-Link Commander, only. J-Flash will follow within the next few weeks. Stay up-to-date regarding J-Link: segger.com/notification/subscribe.php?prodid=7,94 Sorry for any inconveniences caused. Best regards, Erik
-
Hello, We are not aware of any issues with J-Link + EZR32LG in current versions. I just gave it a quick try here but I cannot reproduce such an issue. Setup: - J-Link GDB Server / DLL V6.88 - EZR32LG 868 MHz Wireless Starter kit (EZR32LG330FG60G device mounted) - J-Link V10 - Windows 10 - Test environment: download.segger.com/Erik/20111…2LG330F256RXX_GDBTest.zip Do you see any differences between our setups? Could you please give our test environment a quick try and provide feedback? - Erik
-
We just implemented support for Zbit Semiconductor ZB25VQ32, ZB25VQ64 and ZB25VQ128 SPI flashes. The change will be part of upcoming beta (V6.85c), scheduled to be available by the end of this week. Stay up-to-date regarding J-Link: segger.com/notification/subscribe.php?prodid=7,94 Best regards Erik
-
You are welcome BTW: Yes you would have to modify the setup code but it's a solution which may work on any setup. Without this approach, it's kind of impossible to perform a proper reset on certain devices. We consider this thread as closed for now. BR Erik
-
Quote from v01d: “The issue is how to cleanly halt the core immediately -before it executes any instruction - in my ResetTarget() (inside jlink script) after releasing it, and before it executes anything - it must be way too slow invoke halt through JLINK API inside the script. ” Welcome to our daily business Implementing a clean reset is everything but straight forward on modern MCUs as bootloaders are involved and booting from different boot sources. Basically the CPU must be halted after boot…
-
Quote from v01d: “Is there way to plainly prevent whatever calls the script's ResetTarget() from checking the CPU's debug registers after ResetTarget returns? And stop trying to halt it? ” No, there is no option to prevent this and there are no plans to add such a option as it does not make any sense from our point of view. So far, this procedure works for all supported devices (over 7000) out there and we do not see any use case where this procedure does not work. We know that implementing a pr…
-
Hello, Quote: “However, we do have another defective J-Link Plus from 2014, serial number 609300932: would this unit also be eligible for the trade-in program? ” Yes. Regarding firmware downgrade: You cannot perform a downdate of the J-Link V10 firmware using V4.96m because this version does not support the J-Link V10 firmware.
-
Thank you for the update. We will consider this case as closed for now. Best regards Erik
-
Hello, We were able to reproduce not the same issue but a similar one. This one will be fixed in the next official version (V6.62b), scheduled to be available later today. Could you please give this version a quick try and provide feedback? BTW: I noticed that you do *not* perform a reset prior programming. This is recommended in order to make sure that the device is in a proper / defined state before programming. Best regards Erik
-
Hello, We can add this to our ToDo list but without a high priority because the demand is relative low compared to other requested devices and there are many other pressing / paid projects which needs to be finished before. If you need support for this short term, we recommend to add it on your own using the Open Flashloader. wiki.segger.com/Open_Flashloader#Create_a_Flash_Loader Best regards Erik
-
The gain of such a functionality is nearly zero as the click on File -> Save data file as takes longer than changing the data type which can be done in < 1 s with the keyboard ("tab" followed by "i"). However, I will add this on the ToDo list anyhow but please note that we cannot assign a high priority to this.